June 12, 2021

June 12, 2021

Your Source for Free Speech,
Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

Trump Administration Overturns Unsafe Obama Automobile Standards

by | Apr 7, 2020 |

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

In 2012, the Obama administration mandated a draconian and dangerous mileage standard for American automobiles, an upgraded and severe version of the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards previously in place. Each manufacturer’s total fleet of cars was to achieve an average of 46.7 miles per gallon (mpg) by the year 2026. 
There was no new technology on the horizon to achieve this impractical goal. Therefore, every company had to take all the excess protective weight from many of their internal combustion-engined cars or they had to manufacture enough electric cars to bring their average mileage up to the new standard. Former President Barack Obama’s CAFE also limited the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions for each car each year through 2026.
Obama’s approach was never about making driving less expensive or safer. It was always about getting gasoline-powered cars off the road, to be replaced by electric cars, and, in the process, throwing consumer safety to the wind. Underlying all of this was, of course, their belief that CO2 produced by human activity was causing dangerous climate change.

The Obama administration was effectively in partnership with overzealous environmental groups who never cared about public safety or economics. The long-term goal was simply to eliminate the use of fossil fuels at all costs.

That goal was no longer just hidden in the terrible CAFE legislation; it became their openly admitted goal. Fortunately, they are no longer in power and the Trump administration has enabled a new CAFE rule which, to a considerable extent, repairs the damage.
The new legislation, promulgated jointly by US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), is called the Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule. SAFE sets standards for both passenger vehicles and light trucks for model years 2021 through 2026.
In contrast to the requirements mandated by Obama that there needed to be about a 5% reduction per year in CO2 emissions, President Donald Trump is only insisting on 1.5% per year. Even that is unnecessary, of course, since CO2 is not a pollutant, but it is a significantly less onerous target than existed previously and at least provides regulatory certainty by establishing one set of standards for passenger cars and light trucks.
The new regulation also requires manufacturers to achieve an average mileage efficiency for all its vehicles of 40.4 mpg, a high standard indeed but at least not as severe as Obama’s CAFE mandated 46.7 mpg. Before reaching the aforementioned requirements, the EPA and NHTSA worked together for nearly two years to analyze automobile and fuel technologies and evaluated 750,000 public comments and held three public meetings. Whether automobile manufacturers can achieve the 40.4 mpg standard is questionable but, unlike CAFE, it is at least possible. The senior writer of this article, Dr. Jay Lehr has driven a small gasoline powered car for the past eight years and it generally gets 40 mpg.
While one shouldn’t blindly accept positive projections from government regulators, we are told that the SAFE Vehicle Rule will increase U.S. competitiveness in the automobile field by reducing regulatory costs by as much as $100 billion through 2029 and increase sales during that same period by 2.7 million new vehicles. This should provide help for millions of American workers and thousands of businesses in the auto sector and related industries. According to the EPA press release, we would also see the following benefits:

  • “required technology costs would be reduced by $86 to $126 billion over the lifetimes of vehicles through MY [manufacturing year] 2029”
  • “$200 billion reduction in total costs over the lifetimes of vehicles through MY 2029, including the value of increased safety”
  • “$1,400 reduction of total consumer cost of ownership per new vehicle”

It is also estimated that, as a result of this rule change, the average new vehicle price will decline by a $1,000 making it easier for Americans to afford to buy new vehicles. This would have a huge impact on vehicle safety since, on average, Americans are now driving 12-year-old cars, and virtually every new vehicle exceeds the built-in safety features of older cars. NHTSA research shows that the SAFE Vehicle Rule will result in a reduction in:

  • crash fatalities by over 3,000
  • injuries by nearly 400,000 
  • close to 2 million damaged vehicles 

…over the life of vehicles built according to the new standards.
If this is all correct, then it would be the most effective replacement of a regulation in Trump’s term in office. It is hard to argue with the statement by U.S. Secretary of Transportation Elaine L. Chao on March 31 that, “Today, President Trump is keeping his promise to autoworkers made three years ago that he would reinvigorate American auto manufacturing by updating costly, increasingly unachievable fuel economy and vehicle CO2 emissions standards, and that is what the Safer Affordable Fuel-Efficient Vehicles Rule accomplishes.”
Image: Reuters

Avatar

Dr. Jay Lehr is a Senior Policy Analyst with the International Climate Science Coalition and former Science Director of The Heartland Institute. He is an internationally renowned scientist, author, and speaker who has testified before Congress on dozens of occasions on environmental issues and consulted with nearly every agency of the national government and many foreign countries. After graduating from Princeton University at the age of 20 with a degree in Geological Engineering, he received the nation’s first Ph.D. in Groundwater Hydrology from the University of Arizona. He later became executive director of the National Association of Groundwater Scientists and Engineers.

Tom Harris is Executive Director of the Ottawa, Canada-based International Climate Science Coalition, and a policy advisor to The Heartland Institute. He has 40 years experience as a mechanical engineer/project manager, science and technology communications professional, technical trainer, and S&T advisor to a former Opposition Senior Environment Critic in Canada’s Parliament.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dave James
Dave James
1 year ago

As Mr. Tom Harris and Dr. Jay Lehr acknowledge in their by-line, both are associates of the Heartland Institute. From their opinion piece, it is obvious that one of their major roles is to promote the Heartland Institute’s political agenda. In this article, Dr. Lehr & Mr. Harris full endorse the Trump adminstration’s to allow cars to emit more pollution but even the automakers, the obvious winners from the proposal, balked. The changes, they said, went too far even for them. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/13/climate/cafe-emissions-rollback-oil-industry.html
Dr. Lehr and Mr. Harris claim they are non-partisan and interested in science but their opinion pieces tell a different story. Mr. Harris wrote in comments, “The fact that we boost Trump’s position on prosperity and the environment is not partisan.” (Source “Real Environmentalists Should Support Trump – Here Is Why” By Dr. Jay Lehr & Tom Harris, Mar 3, 2020. America Out Loud)
Mr. Harris and Dr. Lehr assertion about President Trump’s role back of CAFE standards is not accurate. There are many problems with Trump’s proposal among them: 1) The agencies were forced to abandon their cost-benefit analysis from the initial proposed rule, as it was riddled with errors. And now they have been forced to finalize a rule that shows net costs to society. 2) The agencies have overestimated the impact of fuel efficiency improvements on car prices by ignoring various compliance options available to manufacturers. 3) The agencies have underestimated the climate damages caused by the rollback, through the use of an arbitrary calculation of the social cost of carbon. 4)The agencies significantly overstate the extent to which rolling back the Clean Car Standards will lead to less pollution, less congestion, and fewer accidents as consumers drive less etc…(Source “Key Economic Errors in the Clean Car Standards Rollback Institute for Policy Integrity at NYU School of Law, Apr 1, 2020)
Eventually, the Trump administration will have to defend this sloppy role-back rule in court. It must explain to judges why it made the decisions it did and what kind of data and analysis supported those decisions; otherwise, the court could rule it “arbitrary and capricious. The errors in the administration’s analysis are legion, and not subtle: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/10/trumps-clean-car-rollback-is-riddled-with-math-errors-clouding-its-legal-future/574249/

trackback
Biden’s Electric Car Delusion | America Out Loud
3 months ago

[…] Joe tells us that he will work to develop a new fuel economy standard that goes beyond what the Obama/Biden administration put in place. But the fuel economy standards brought on by the Obama led to lighter weight and less safe vehicles. As we explained in our April 7th America Out Loud article, “Trump Administration Overturns Unsafe Obama Automobile Standards:” […]

trackback
Biden’s Climate Hustle? No Thanks, Joe! | America Out Loud
3 months ago

[…] Besides the fact that we will not have enough power plants to power a huge increase in electric cars, promoting the expansion of electric vehicles when average people cannot afford them will cause most people to keep their old vehicles beyond their safe life. In fact, fuel economy standards brought on by the Obama/Biden administration led to lighter weight and less safe vehicles. As we explained in our April 7th America Out Loud article, “Trump Administration Overturns Unsafe Obama Automobile Standards,” […]

Use the code ‘OUTLOUD’ and receive your 20% discount on your first order.

Mothers Against Experimental Vaccines

Mothers Against Experimental Vaccines

The Covid-19 vaccine has been the cause of more deaths than all vaccines in the 15 year period between 1997-2013 combined. In a four-month period, the experimental jab reported 3,362 deaths (averaging 30 deaths a day), and that’s only a fraction of what’s being reported. In just three days in 2021, more deaths were caused by…

Trading US Energy Independence for China Rare Earth Dependence Benefits Only Beijing

Trading US Energy Independence for China Rare Earth Dependence Benefits Only Beijing

Biden and his handlers have re-upped the U.S. in the Paris Climate Accord and called for slashing our greenhouse emissions by 50% or more by 2030 over the 2005 level, China, the largest CO2-emitter, gets a free pass to continue ramping up its coal development until 2030. We can also but imagine that Biden Family Inc. isn’t anxious to risk ugly Beijing extortion blowback regarding legendary foreign influence-peddling demons known to be residing in Hunter’s laptop from Hell…

Following the ‘Real Science’ of Medicine: McCullough and Risch

Following the ‘Real Science’ of Medicine: McCullough and Risch

Fauci has ties to the gain-of-function research that developed the dangerous Wuhan spike protein, which is the primary protein produced in the bodies of those who are seduced into vaccination with Pfizer, Moderna, and JNJ products. These vaccines have led to record-setting ~300,000 CDC-certified safety reports, including >5000 tragic and unnecessary American deaths…

The Mutiny of Medicine Is Almost Complete

The Mutiny of Medicine Is Almost Complete

Both the Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine faced severe criticism for publishing “controversial COVID-19 papers,” the controversy involving misinformation, fraud, and lack of scientific integrity. So harsh was the backlash that both journals retracted the articles. The Lancet also retracted a false study stating the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine was dangerous and of no benefit in treating COVID-19. Wrong!

Al Sisi’s Resurgent Egypt

Al Sisi’s Resurgent Egypt

It was al Sisi who mediated directly between Israel and Hamas because Egypt is the only Arab country adjoining and controlling the flow of life to Gaza, not Biden from 5900 miles away. To help the people of Gaza, al Sisi opened the crossings to allow urgent food and medical supplies to go through and allow the injured to be taken care of in Egyptian hospitals…

Who Pays for AOC’s ‘Abuela-Care?’

Who Pays for AOC’s ‘Abuela-Care?’

AOC blames others for her grandmother’s roof but does nothing herself. Matt Walsh does something himself. AOC wants taxpayer coercively funded government action. Matt Walsh took direct action with his own money. Which one is more compassionate? Which one cares more about family?

The War of the Red Dragon

The War of the Red Dragon

China believes in three forms of warfare: informational, economic, and kinetic (aka ‘guns blazing’). China determined that the United States would win a kinetic war, so while they saw war with the United States as necessary, they decided to use information warfare, and economic warfare, avoiding a kinetic war until China was in a position to win…

China’s Future in the Balance

China’s Future in the Balance

When we look at China today, the brutal purge and genocide of the Uyghurs, the persecution of the Falun Gong, the brutal suppression of the Chinese people throughout the COVID-19 crisis which the Chinese government itself caused, we should now understand that if Xi is willing to do this to his own people, what will he not be willing to do to us?

China Meddling in Our Local Elections

China Meddling in Our Local Elections

They use bribery, promises of lucrative industrial cooperation, jobs for everybody, etc., to get political leaders to taste the honey. Democrats are China’s lackeys, their fellow travelers, so to speak, and always, will be the first level that disappears into the gulags, prisons, or work camps. Democrats don’t see it coming because they don’t see what they’re losing. We see it; we just ignore it hoping…

Gates, Fauci, Covid Policing, and the New Normal

Gates, Fauci, Covid Policing, and the New Normal

Could Dr. Fauci’s “stakeholdings” with the Gates Foundation’s Leadership Council have clouded his thinking about hydroxychloroquine while declaring vaccines as the only cure and his support for “immunity cards” that could alert authorities to which Americans had not gotten their CCP virus vaccinations? Will he personally benefit from the Gates’ vaccines?

Your Source for Free Speech, Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

 

Here we take on the challenges of our generation so that we can preserve future generations.

iHeartRadio

The APPS are free; the mission is priceless!

Free APP

Podcast Networks

Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Tunein
iHeart
Stitcher

Subscribe and Listen on Your Favorite APP

Our Columnists and Show Hosts

Support wounded and fallen police officers. The Wounded Blue.

Apple Podcasts
Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap