In reality I am insulting the true inmates of such institutions because almost all of them have serious issues that are invariably beyond their control. On the other hand, the men and women who fill the UN building are NOT mentally challenged but invariably well-educated and learned people who have access to any and most information they need to use and or formulate their opinions and conclusions.

Thus putting it mildly, it is actually offensive to compare the United Nations to an insane asylum. Those unfortunate people in the asylum should never be compared to the shiftless, corrupt, arrogant misfits that occupy the UN.

The United Nations was created in 1945 by the victorious allies to avoid conflicts between member states by using diplomacy instead thus avoiding ever again having catastrophic World Wide Conflicts such as WWI and WWII especially under the new Nuclear Age.

Tragically, as what happened with League of Nations before it, the UN devolved very quickly into impotence starting in 1948.

In defiance of UN Resolution 181 of 1947 allowing for the creation of TWO States in British Mandated Palestine, one for the Jews and one for the Arabs, Four Arab states: Egypt, Jordan, Iraq, Syria invaded the new state with their publicly declared purpose to Exterminate the Jews.

No one in the UN lifted a finger to stop the conflict although the intentions of the Arabs were declared in public. After this failure, more conflicts occurred in India/Pakistan, Korea, Africa, Middle East, Vietnam and more not one of which was avoided by the UN.

The slide into impotence and irrelevance continued unabated especially when the UN has had 193 member states.

Tragically, because the UN has a disproportionate number of member states that are mostly Theocratic, Dictatorial, Autocratic, Dogmatic or Despotic, the voting on any issue is not based on Logic, Morality or Justice but invariably on irrational, immoral, unjust and selfish reasons to perpetuate their tyrannical hold on their peoples and nations.

To start with, there are 57 Muslim majority states who vote in BULK against any UN proposal that may conflict with their Sharia which means they will not allow UN rules regarding the enforcement of Freedom of other Religions under Islamic rule, of Free Press, against Female Genital Mutilation, Equality of Women and many others.

Please readers always remember that these 57 Muslim majority states are not only providers and protectors of International Terrorism but are also among the Least Productive, Least Inventive and or Least Creative in the 21st Century.

Is it at all conceivable that any European or American leader declares publicly his or her intention to Eradicate or Exterminate another UN member and its people? Rationally, this must sound as an extremely stupid question YET, not a single member country in the UN stands up to be counted when the Ayatollahs of Iran declare publicly and repeatedly their intentions for the Extermination of Americans and Israelis.

The UN is an asymmetrical organization pitting Democratic nations (minority) against Dictatorial ones (majority) thus regularly the General Assembly produces articles and resolutions that are not only asinine but are morally and legally repugnant forcing especially the USA to overrule several of the most egregious of them.

Let me share with you how the meaning of words has been contorted to fit in with the UN Globalist agenda~

Diversity: The inclusion of different types of people (such as people of different races or cultures) in a group or organization.

Inclusivity: The practice or policy of including people who might otherwise be excluded or marginalized, such as those who have physical or mental disabilities and members of minority groups.

Logically, there is nothing to argue against BUT just like in nature, diversity means lions, hawks and sharks, eat zebra, rabbits and seals.

The notion of “all inclusivity” in a garden, means the weeds will eventually take over unless they are treated.

Back to human reality; how can Democratic states co-exist and survive with Sharia compliant Muslim citizens when Sharia is against ALL human beings who are NOT Muslims called Kuffar/ Infidels (currently 80% of humanity) comprising all Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Jews, Atheists, Agnostics, Pagans, etc.?

How is it possible for Diversity and Inclusivity to succeed when Muslims are mandated by their Sharia NEVER to Integrate or Assimilate among Kuffar/ Infidels?

Culture: The customary beliefs, social forms, and material traits of a racial, religious, or social group as well as the characteristic features of everyday existence (such as diversions or a way of life) shared by people in a place or time

For the last 60 years, academics, clerics, media and politicians have been telling Western peoples that “all cultures are equal, that they are all equally valuable”. Furthermore, they assert that “irrespective of the FACT that it was Western capitalists, scientists and industrialists (mostly White European cultures) who created the modern industrial, scientific and technological world” are no better than Arab, Persian, Islamic, Indian or Chinese cultures anywhere else.

Again, I demand an answer to the following very simple question. If cultures are equal, can anyone name TEN Muslims (Arabs, Persian or any other) who have contributed anything whatsoever to the advancement and or betterment of humanity in any field of human endeavour from among 2,000,000,000 in the last 700 years?

If all cultures were equal, no one would leave their country to reside in another. The supreme irony of how FALSE the mantra that “all cultures are equal” resides in the fact, that there is a mass EXODUS from non-white, non-Western countries into the White West.

This is a crystal clear indication that these Arab, African and Asian invaders believe that cultures are NOT EQUAL, and that the white world and culture are superior to their own. Ironically they – by default – are the true white supremacists.

Caucasians: In the United States, the root term Caucasian has also often been used in a different, societal context as a synonym for white or of European, Middle Eastern, or North African ancestry.

White people is a racial classification specifier, used mostly and often exclusively for people of European descent; depending on context, nationality, and point of view.

In summation, the UN is a model of what every Western nation will become should they allow continued mass immigration from “Citizens of the World” — of the sort who give the UN its particular character.

If this is the future the USA and Europe want for themselves, they need only open the borders and allow that depraved future in.