The debate over global warming, now in its third decade, has never been about science, or climate for that matter. The long term goal of the movement is to unite the world under a single socialistic government in which there is no capitalism, no democracy, and no freedom. Personal freedom is in fact fueled by the access to affordable energy. A shorter term goal is to limit the amount of energy that is available and place it under government control. The availability of inexpensive fossil fuels remains an obstacle to this vision.
However, renewable energy sources including solar and wind power are incapable of meeting the world’s energy needs either now or in the future. Both their cost, which must be heavily subsidized by your taxes, and their inadequate volumes. make them prohibitive. Were they not they would have taken over long ago. THE PUBLIC NEEDS TO CARE far more vigilantly than they currently do because energy impacts every facet of one’s daily life and the war against fossil fuels is already taking a toll.
ENERGY COSTS are increasing because public utilities are being forced to replace some existing economical power with solar and wind farms driving up electricity bills significantly since the year 2000. Low-income families and small businesses are the biggest losers.
Until President Trump took charge GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS were increasing to the tune of nearly 75,000 new federal regulations aimed at energy providers during the past administration (1). It is estimated that these regulations cost our economy hundreds of billions of dollars per year.
The OBJECTIVITY of major government agencies is declining. All agencies that fund or regulate activities relating to climate including the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency, National Aeronautic and Space Agency, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation and the Environmental Protection Agency have become so heavily politicized that any project, scientist, or activity that can be remotely connected to global warming is being forced to align with the movement.
The INTEGRITY of science and scientists is declining. Scientists must look out for their own self-interest. They know that if they want to receive research funding, publish papers, and even retain their jobs, they had better support the global warming movement. The net result is a loss of credibility for all scientists and the propagation of falsehoods regarding global warming that are too numerous to count.
PERSONAL FREEDOMS are declining. Socialists are using global warming to attack freedom of speech guaranteed by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Justin Haskins in his new book SOCIALISM IS EVIL (2) said “the main reason I oppose socialism is because regardless of the outcomes a socialized country might experience, I believe a socialist system requires certain freedoms to be eliminated-freedoms so essential to humanity that they ought to be considered inalienable human rights.”
Several U.S. states are trying to pass unconstitutional legislation that would make it a crime to speak out against man-caused global warming. Socialists are also trying to place all energy sources under government control using a ‘smart grid’ that will eventually be able to monitor and dictate the energy use of all Americans.
BUSINESSES in the energy sector were in a heap of trouble before President Trump came on the scene. The coal industry in the state of West Virginia was on the edge of bankruptcy. The oil and gas industry was handcuffed by impediments to pipelines and drilling rights
The climate change agenda is seriously damaging the United States and other free market economies. The socialist agenda of crippling affordable energy to weaken our country is working. While our economy is now booming it will continue to be threatened as long as our government bases any of its policies on the global warming movement.
Global warming represents the most pervasive and damaging example of scientific fraud in world history. Progressives and the media perpetuate this fraud using a combination of misinformation and the suppression and falsification of Climate data.
Scientists in disagreement with the global warming movement, risk losing their ability to publish papers, receive government funding, or even stay employed. Even so, a broad spectrum of scientists and meteorologists have spoken out to say that there is no compelling evidence to support the hypothesis that humans are the cause of any climate changes observed in modern times.
No one wants to see the Earth’s Climate destroyed. However, all of the serious negative consequences mentioned above are being inflicted on you to solve a problem that doesn’t even exist.
In reality the global warming movement has nothing to do with saving the planet. It has everything to do with the redistribution of wealth and political agendas aimed at destroying the foundation of western democracies and free market economies as exemplified by the United States of America. For this reason, it is critical for everyone to become informed on the topic of global warming. There needs to be free and open debate on this topic rather than the suppression and falsification of actual scientific climate data.
- Meyer,A., New EPA Regs Issued Under Obama are 38 Times as Long as the Bible, cnsnews.com June 23, 2014
- Henry Dearborn Institute 2018
Portions of this article have been excerpted with permission of the publisher and author of the 2018 book THE MYTHOLOGY OF GLOBAL WARMING by Bruce Bunker, Ph.D., Publisher :Moonshine Cove. The authors of this article strongly recommend that book as the very best sourced detailed accurate information on the climate change debate.