Sharia Law Not Compatible With U.S. Constitution
Neither a lawyer nor a Constitutional expert here, however, the U.S. Constitution was written in such a fashion whereby all should understand its meaning. After reading this piece, the only logical conclusion one can come away with, in my estimation, is that Sharia law is absolutely in stark contrast to out U.S. Constitution, our way of life, and extremely lethal to humanity. And finally, how in good conscience can anyone not reading this and still call Islam a religion, when in essence it has every aspect of a dangerous cult.
Let’s begin by reviewing Article VI of the U.S. Constitution—
Article VI of the U.S. Constitution
All debts contracted and engagements entered into, before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.
Now let’s review the dangers of Islam that encompasses Sharia law followed by finally making the case against it even stronger.
Jihad Watch encapsulates the dangers—
As one may see, there are few aspects of life that Sharia does not specifically govern. Everything from washing one’s hands to child-rearing to taxation to military policy fall under its dictates. Because Sharia is derivate of the Quran and the Sunnah, it affords some room for interpretation. But upon examination of the Islamic source… it is apparent that any meaningful application of Sharia is going to look very different from anything resembling a free or open society in the Western sense. The stoning of adulterers, execution of apostates and blasphemers, repression of other religions, and a mandatory hostility toward non-Islamic nations punctuated by regular warfare will be the norm. It seems fair then to classify Islam and its Sharia code as a form of totalitarianism.
m3.4 – 3.7 say that a woman may not “conduct her own marriage”, meaning that she is not free to marry by choice. A male guardian is required to validate the marriage agreement.
m3.8 says that a woman is not free to choose her guardian. It is assigned by family relation. Once she is married, she becomes the charge of her husband’s guardianship.
A Muslim woman may not marry a non-Muslim man (Quran 2:221). An untranslated portion of the Sharia even forbids an Arab woman from marrying a non-Arab man (source).
(m13.4) – A woman has no right to custody of her children from a previous marriage when she remarries.
(m5.1) – It is obligatory for a woman to let her husband have sex with her immediately when he asks her… and she can physically endure it.
(m10.11-2) – It is not lawful for a wife to leave the house except by the permission of her husband.
(m10.11) – When a husband notices signs of rebelliousness in his wife, he warns her in words. If she commits rebelliousness, he keeps from sleeping with her without words, and may hit her, but not in a way that injures her, meaning he may not break bones, wound her, or cause blood to flow.
(o4.9) – The indemnity for the death or injury of a woman is one-half the indemnity paid for a man.
(L10.3) – Divide the universal share so the male receives the portion of two females (Rule of inheritance based on the Quran 4:11)
(m2.3) – It is unlawful for women to leave the house with faces unveiled
(o9.13) – When a child or a woman is taken captive, they become slaves by the fact of capture, and the woman’s previous marriage is immediately annulled.
o4.9 is one of several rules that establish slaves as property, to be traded as a form of restitution.
Permissible lying (Taqiyya)
Whether the purpose is war, settling a disagreement, or gaining the sympathy of a victim legally entitled to retaliate against one so that he will forbear to do so; it is not unlawful to; lie when any of these aims can only be attained through lying. But is religiously more precautionary in all such cases to employ words that give misleading impression, meaning to intend by one’s words something that is literally true, in respect to which one is not lying while the outward purport of the words deceives the hearer…
One should compare the bad consequences entailed by lying to those entailed by telling the truth, and if the consequences of telling the truth are more damaging, one is entitled to lie…
Following is a 1992 video where a 400 acre ranch was raided in Colorado and what they found was chilling.
The past Presidential administrations before President Trump placed strict rules on how our FBI investigations were to proceed over the years and even cancelling investigations altogether.
Today there are various closed in compounds across America where Muslims live and raise families. The most dangerous is by far an organization calling themselves “Muslims of America” or Fuqra. Areas such as Islamberg NY and Islamville in South Carolina are the most notable in the press. They no doubt practice Sharia law and raise their children in all the precepts of Islam.
This video about Fuqra was posted in 2009—
If there is one man President Trump should personally speak with privately, one on one, about this expanded and grave threat of Islam it should be Philip Haney former Department of Homeland Security investigator, now retired.
The final nail in the case against Sharia law is based on our country’s founding which expressly proclaims it’s principles that all our laws are based from ones individual “life liberty and the pursuit of happiness”.
The Preamble to the Declaration of Independence served as the catalyst to our U.S. Constitution. The Preamble represents what our Founders and Framers previously complained about, concerning the overreach of the King of England on basic human rights—
“When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.”
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Sharia law is extremely intrusive to an individual’s universal natural right from harming their life and liberties which also affects their individual happiness.
It’s my opinion freedom of religion as specified in our U.S. Constitution was never meant for the practice of controlling, enslaving, dominating another person or nation or by killing a human being simply because ones so-called religion or actions indicates that it is OK to do so.
America has an extremely grave situation today with Islam in America and many non-Islamic Americans have already suffered and died because of it and no doubt will continue to do so unless something is done to remove the threat immediately. We are already many, many years behind. Imagine what goes on in Muslim households in America when it comes to basic human rights? No doubt the women alone must feel trapped with no avenue of escape for fear of beatings and death.
The only probable course of action I see for America is to outlaw the practice of Islam from the U.S. before we have a civil war over it or drown in it by being eventually controlled by it and or killed. But how do we “put the genie back in the bottle?” One course of action to start with is repatriation of Muslim refugees back to their homelands as soon as possible and outlaw Sharia before it’s too late. The more we delay it the harder it will be to politically achieve it. Anyone who thinks that a “reformation” is possible is kidding themselves; living a dream. How can you stop a group of men bent on control and domination that is taught to them as soon as they are able to speak as children, day in and day out, pounded into their young minds? Wake up America before it’s too late!
For Further Insight:
Read what a female survivor had to say about living under Sharia law in Iran, she tells her story after arriving in the United States and free from its tentacles—
“The dire danger to America lies in the lies told by our leftist government and media and the ignorance of many Americans about Islam’s true character and purpose.” More of her story – Sharia USA: From a Survivor
In a nutshell, Islam is a CULT belief system; the Cult of Muhammad and Allah is the mouthpiece of the Ventriloquist Muhammad. IQ al-Rassooli