This Democratic Party’s impeachment farce, apart from costing taxpayers boatloads of money we don’t have, will never achieve the Progressives’ intended goal of getting rid of Donald Trump! And⏤Hillary Clinton will never become President and Jeffrey Epstein didn’t kill himself. 

Nancy Pelosi, the elderly nymphette of botox non-importance, is putting forward a good face against her dilemma. Nancy realizes that AOC’s squad of Radical is now the driving force for impeachment and that she has lost control not only of her caucus but the argument as well. Being between a rock and a hard spot, Pelosi will use the soothing words of the US Constitution, with meditative prayer when it supports her, as a sop for the masses. She’ll as quickly change the script when it does not support her, like this impeachment nonsense. What are the charges brought against Donald Trump: “Abuse of Power and “Obstruction of Congress” and how are they impeachable?

These charges are meaningless, laughably lacking any serious import. Always, in the face of failure, Democrats, at the last minute will dig up some important new evidence in the form of a non-player witness like Lev Parnas, who manages to impeach his own testimony with every breathless interviewer claiming they found missing uncounted ballots in the trunk of a poll watchers car? They do this all the time.

It’s because the democrats are basically criminals, liars and cheats like deadly microbes in a petri dish, slowly dying without power. Where’s the Energizer Bunny when you need her? 

What does the US Constitution say about it? Well first, the charges are unconstitutional. The Constitution Party of Georgia, via the Madison Forum, weigh’s in with these observations: “Article 2, Section 4 clearly requires a significant and serious crime to justify impeachment. No such crime is alleged in the two impeachment articles because the House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees did not hear witnesses who provided evidence of impeachable actions through their firsthand accounts of the material facts in question.” 

The laughably fabricated word for word discussion of the phone call between Trump and Ukraine President Zalensky, as performed by House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff, (D-Ca), was immediately destroyed by release of the real phone call transcript. It should have been enough to stop them but their scheme goes on. Our elected Politicians should realize their oaths require them to observe the Constitution and adhere to the tenants of Due Process found in the 5th and 14th Amendments. What could be difficult about that? The rules were practiced when Nixon faced Impeachment and resigned and when Bill Clinton was impeached and didn’t. 

About fairness, the Georgia Constitutional Party wrote: “The House committees deprived Trump of due process by violating many of their own due process rules. For example, the House Intelligence Committee denied the minority party the ability to issue subpoenas, call their own witnesses, and receive proper notice of meetings. When Trump refused to participate in these corrupt anti-American proceedings, the Judiciary Committee bypassed litigation and charged him with Obstruction of Congress in the second impeachment article. Such a dishonest process threatens to transform our republic’s standards of equal protection under just laws. Those who voted for either of the impeachment articles violated their oath of office to uphold the Constitution.”

This is not a legal trial but a political one designed to try to prevent Trump a second term in 2020. For Democrats to accomplish their goal it’s imperative that they meddle with the rules, even in the Senate, so they can demand “fairness” in the process.

If that rascally Mitch McConnell won’t do their bidding, in the name of fairness, and Trump is acquitted then the Republican process must be corrupt. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md), said: “anybody not for witnesses in the trial would be “fixing and rigging the trial” and “complicit in a cover-up.”  “So, we need four Republican senators, and I think the pressure will build because if you’re not willing to call witnesses and get relevant documents at a trial, you are for fixing and rigging the trial. And they would be complicit in a cover-up.” Therefore, the argument goes, any Republican Senator who shows pro-Trump bias should recuse themselves, but not Democrat Senators of course, for they are not biased. My God, where are we headed as a nation, Into totalitarism? Yes, if Democrats are allowed to succeed. 

Pelosi is famous for taking a positive position on issues that favor Democrats and changing her opinion when the reverse applies to them. Her articles of impeachment obviously lack substance, and what does Pelosi say?: “So, in any case, it’s not a question of saying what proof. It says what allegations have been made and that has to be subjected to scrutiny as to how we go forward, but it should not be ignored, and the context of other events that have happened that would substantiate some of that,” All babble.

Didn’t that old MSM TV news reporter Dan Rather, who got fired for his kniving do that to George Bush? Rather, when caught lying himself, said: “It’s not the lack of evidence, it’s the seriousness of the charges that need to be investigated!” Those are methods and techniques right out of the Democrat “How to destroy your enemy” playbook. In the end, one of the two main political party’s will be destroyed.

Remember, freedom is the goal, the Constitution is the way. Now, let’s go get ’em!