June 21, 2021

June 21, 2021

Your Source for Free Speech,
Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

H.R.1 Election Integrity Act is a Wolf in Wolf’s Clothing

by | May 25, 2021 |

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

It is not surprising that climate activists support Bill H.R.1 – For the People Act of 2021.* After all, the bill would hugely benefit the Democrats over the GOP and increase the likelihood that the Dems will win most future elections. So, naturally, every Democrat in the House of Representatives sponsored H.R.1. And, at least for now, the Dems are the party of climate alarmism. 

Of course, few climate campaigners would admit that H.R.1 greatly benefits the Democrats over the Republicans as activists want bipartisan support for their plans. Instead, they tell us that it will ensure fairer elections and give more voice to the average American, who, activists assert, will be highly supportive of drastic action to stop climate change. But neither claim makes any sense. H.R.1 is not for most people at all. And, regardless, most Americans do not support drastic action on climate change.

Let’s look at the second of these issues first—the idea put forward by climate campaigners that, given the choice, a large plurality of working-class Americans, especially those in black communities, would support severe action on climate change. This support is a natural outcome, climate campaigners assert, of the supposed fact that “Low-income and tribal communities, as well as communities of color, are increasingly and disproportionately affected by climate change.” For example, environmentalist Bill McKibben claimed in the New Yorker on March 17, 2021 (“The Voter-Suppression Bill Is Also Our Most Important Climate Legislation”):

Allowing Black and brown people, their rightful voice will help raise the prospects of climate legislation because they care about it more than anyone else in the country.

To support this idea, McKibben links to “Which racial/ethnic groups care most about climate change?” published by the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication. That article, in turn, cites three reports from the Yale program:

Besides the fact that the first report is 11 years old, it shows quite mixed results. For example, for data collected in 2008, while it does show greater concern on the part of Blacks and Hispanics on some issues, it also showed that more Whites than Blacks strongly supported efforts to:

  • Fund more research into renewable energy sources such as solar and wind power.
  • Require electric utilities to produce at least 20% of electricity from wind, solar, or other renewable energy sources, even if it cost the average household an extra $100 a year.
  • Provide tax rebates for people who purchase energy-efficient vehicles or solar panels.
  • Require automakers to increase the fuel efficiency of cars, trucks, and SUVS to 45 mpg, even if it means a new vehicle will cost up to $1,000 more to buy.

When one adds “Strongly support” to “Somewhat support” for the above actions, the difference between Blacks and Whites for these actions is so small it falls within the margin of error of the survey.

The survey also admitted: 

Large majorities (67%) of Americans opposed a 25 cent per gallon gasoline tax [at the time of the survey, nationwide retail gas prices were about $3.25/gallon], even if the revenues were returned to taxpayers by reducing the federal income tax, including majorities of all racial and ethnic groups.

Neither the April 2019 nor the November 2919 “Climate Change in the American Mind” reports linked to above address differences between racial groups’ attitudes on climate change or energy at all.  

And, don’t expect propagandists in the media and elsewhere to give coverage to polls that show, for example, in the case of the May 2021 Rasmussen Reports/The Heartland Institute poll, that more slightly more Whites than Blacks believe that climate change is caused primarily by human activity.

Another problem with public opinion polls on climate change is that, besides often being ‘push polls’ apparently designed to give answers desired by the originator, they are frequently misinterpreted by media and survey representatives. Take, for example, the “Politics & Global Warming, December 2020” report from the Yale program. The New York Times started an article (“Survey Finds Majority of Voters Support Initiatives to Fight Climate Change,” January 15, 2021) about the report by claiming:

A majority of registered voters of both parties in the United States support initiatives to fight climate change, including many that are outlined in the climate plans announced by President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr., according to a new survey.

They then cited Anthony Leiserowitz, who heads the Yale program, as saying:

These results show there’s very strong public support for bold, ambitious action on climate change and clean energy.

But, when respondents were asked what priority the president and Congress should put on “Global warming,” the response was anything but “very strong.” Here is the breakdown:

Very High: 29%
High: 24%
Medium: 23%
Low: 24%

And later, in the preamble to asking whether respondents supported U.S. participation in the Paris Agreement, it was stated:

In 2015, the United States signed an international agreement in Paris with 196 other countries to limit the pollution that causes global warming.

Paris is focused mostly on reducing carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, which is not “pollution,” of course. Yet, the Yale poll questions and the Yale report itself refer to this benign gas as “pollution,” or worse, “carbon pollution,” numerous times, undoubtedly swaying many poll respondents to give the results climate campaigners want. And the idea that CO2 causes significant global warming is merely a theory that does not stand up to serious scientific scrutiny. 

H. Sterling Burnett, Ph.D., a Heartland senior fellow on environmental policy and the managing editor of Environment & Climate News, sums up the situation well:

After years of fearmongering and attempted indoctrination, people aren’t really that concerned about climate change when the rubber meets the road with action—or dollars in this case.

Finally, the idea that H.R.1 will ensure more fair elections is nonsensical. Indeed, the bill is so bad; it will completely shatter most American’s confidence in our election process. While the Constitution granted each state the responsibility to manage their election process, H.R.1 takes it away and grants that power to the federal government. In addition, H.R.1:

1- bars states from requiring photo IDs;

2- bars states from making their own laws about voting by mail;

3- mandates free mailing of absentee ballots;

4- allows 16-year-olds to register to vote while in school under teacher guidance and, of course, most teachers and young people are Democrats;

5- allows ballot harvesting. According to FindLaw.com, “Democrats appeared to prioritize ballot harvesting more than their Republican counterparts and were able to take over many offices that Republicans previously controlled.”

6- disallows states from clearing individuals from voting rolls when they move out of state;

7- forces states to implement mandatory voter registration eliminating voluntary choice, which benefits Dems most as more lower-class Democrats don’t register;

8- mandates that states allow felons to vote, which, again, benefits Dems as most felons are Democrat;

9- forces states to extend periods of early voting;  

10- mandates same-day voter registration;

11- limits the ability of states to cooperate to see who is registered in more than one state;

12- criminalizes the act of asking a voter if they are an American citizen;

13- requires states to get permission from the federal government for changes as small as modifying hours of an election office or moving a voting location from a school gym to a library;

14- includes a 600% government match for political donations and authorizes more public dollars for campaigns;

15- wants to make Election Day a paid holiday for government workers. 

The Biden administration makes no secret of its effort to turn America into a one-party state–their party, of course. They apparently envy Russia and China and hope to one day make the U.S. a communist nation where only the richest, most powerful people rule. The money behind the Democrats 2020 electoral success and the fraud they managed to pull off is supported by the same autocrats who now limit your free speech, the people behind Amazon, Facebook, Twitter, the Gates Foundation, and Google. The primary puppet master is apparently George Soros, who seems to be using his billions made in our capitalist system to remake America into what will effectively be a fascist or Communist state. Why he evidently hates the America of its founding fathers, we surely do not know. However, we do know that he has been financing one of the vilest groups ever—Black Lives Matter.

H.R.1, so fraudulently titled “For the People Act,” an obvious attempt to hide a wolf in sheep’s clothing, is not sneaking unnoticed through the nation. Twenty states have already sent a letter to Congressional Leaders promising swift consequences were H.R.1 to pass.

The attorney general of the 20 states wrote that “it is difficult to imagine a legislative proposal more threatening to election integrity and voter confidence.” It strips the state legislatures of their constitutionally granted authority to determine how elections will be held in their states.

Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita, the first signer of their letter, told Fox News, “this monstrosity of a bill betrays the Constitution, dangerously federalizes state elections, and undermines the integrity of the ballot box.”

A key paragraph in their letter described how H.R.1 was clearly unconstitutional is:

Under both the Election Clause of Article l of the Constitution and the Electors Clause of Article ll, States have principal – and with presidential elections, exclusive – responsibility to safeguard the manner of holding elections. The Act would invert that constitutional structure, commandeer state resources, confuse and muddle election procedures, and erode faith in our elections and systems of governance.

The attorney generals continue:

The exclusivity of state power to define the method of choosing presidential electors means that Congress may not force states to permit presidential voting by mail or curbside voting, for example.

In the final analysis, what is done by this Congress can be undone by the next, especially if the passage of H.R.1 helps produce a landslide defeat of those who vote for it. In the meantime, let’s hope a few Democratic Senators are not died in the wool socialists and will vote with reason and ethics, not to emulate the governments of China, Russia, Venezuela, and Cuba.

*Bill H.R.1 has passed the U.S. House of Representatives and now is under consideration by the U.S. Senate.


Dr. Jay Lehr is a Senior Policy Analyst with the International Climate Science Coalition and former Science Director of The Heartland Institute. He is an internationally renowned scientist, author, and speaker who has testified before Congress on dozens of occasions on environmental issues and consulted with nearly every agency of the national government and many foreign countries. After graduating from Princeton University at the age of 20 with a degree in Geological Engineering, he received the nation’s first Ph.D. in Groundwater Hydrology from the University of Arizona. He later became executive director of the National Association of Groundwater Scientists and Engineers.

Tom Harris is Executive Director of the Ottawa, Canada-based International Climate Science Coalition, and a policy advisor to The Heartland Institute. He has 40 years experience as a mechanical engineer/project manager, science and technology communications professional, technical trainer, and S&T advisor to a former Opposition Senior Environment Critic in Canada’s Parliament.

Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Use the code ‘OUTLOUD’ and receive your 20% discount on your first order.

The Reason the Patriot Act No Longer Works

The Reason the Patriot Act No Longer Works

We must realize the power of arrest now basically lies in Marxist hands, and they will use it. Already they have perverted the definition of who is and who is not a “terrorist.” It’s no longer the foreign Islamic Jihadists who killed over 3000 Americans in a single day, who are the terrorist!” To suggest is to be labeled Islamaphobic, but Oath Keepers, former American soldiers, and policemen still willing to keep the oaths they took to Protect and Defend the…

To Secede, or Not To Secede, That is the Question for Oregon and Idaho

To Secede, or Not To Secede, That is the Question for Oregon and Idaho

The Oregon vote shows both the desire of the people to change and their willingness to fight for their land. Is that enough? As of the writing, I don’t know how the legislature of Oregon will respond to this vote. Are the legislators willing to trap people in an unhappy situation to further their political goals? We’ve seen that before in world history, and it doesn’t end well.

John Kerry is a Consequential Internal Security Threat to America

John Kerry is a Consequential Internal Security Threat to America

John Kerry co-chaired the 2020 presidential campaign Biden-Sanders unity climate change task force with the socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., which provided the framework for a “Green New Deal,” since repackaged as the Democrat “infrastructure” plan. Kerry has a habit of being in the center of many of the worst policies that pose major security risks for America…

Biden, G7 & the China Conundrum

Biden, G7 & the China Conundrum

The only way to confront the Chinese colossus is by combining the populations, economic and military powers of the USA, Europe, Russia, and India. Excluding Biden’s mental lapses and gaffes, the G7 leaders had a good time amongst themselves at enormous taxpayers’ expenses and returned home, not only empty-handed but empty-minded for completely ignoring all the following items…

5 Tools That Will Help You Tame Anxiety

5 Tools That Will Help You Tame Anxiety

Emotions are actually intelligent indicators meant to get your attention and provide energy and information. Anxiety as an emotional symptom is a sign you are not present. Ultimately, you can retrain your mind with consistent self-care tools and by prioritizing yourself to take the time to reset when your emotions are getting overly amped up…

COVID-19 Vaccines Not Safe for Human Use on Either Side of the Atlantic

COVID-19 Vaccines Not Safe for Human Use on Either Side of the Atlantic

Since the majority of the deaths occur within a few days of the vaccine administration, if the vaccine did not directly “cause” the death, it was undoubtedly in the causal pathway of these temporally related fatalities. Common narratives include vaccine-induced fatal heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, and blood disorders. 5,888 Americans have died and confirmed by the CDC, and possibly tens of thousands not reported or still backlogged at the CDC…

Sadly, Biden Was the Laugh of the G7 Party

Sadly, Biden Was the Laugh of the G7 Party

The President’s behavior throughout the G7 meeting and the meeting with Putin that followed did nothing to alleviate the suspicions that many Americans have that the President’s cognitive ability is fading rapidly. This, of course, leads to another question: Is Joe Biden really able to carry out his duties as President of the United States and leader of the free world?

#BidenBlunders Are Top Greatest US Threats – Not White Supremacists or Global Warming

#BidenBlunders Are Top Greatest US Threats – Not White Supremacists or Global Warming

How does terminating American petroleum and pipelines — while at the same time placating Putin’s — benefit all those drowning Arctic polar bears Al Gore warned us about? I’m betting that lots of recently unemployed coal miners and oil patch roughnecks are among a great many who are questioning these same contradictions regarding America’s truly urgent problems…

Coincidence or Conspiracy to Take Down a Nation

Coincidence or Conspiracy to Take Down a Nation

Now with a clearer vision of the past year and a half, could this nightmare we’ve been living have all been simply happenstance? Or is there something more sinister behind it? When we consider some parallels between the CCP-virus, the now-obvious hanky-panky that surrounded our Nov. 3rd elections, and the false flags unfolding around the January 6th Capitol event, we could almost have a conspiracy!

Your Source for Free Speech, Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.


Here we take on the challenges of our generation so that we can preserve future generations.


The APPS are free; the mission is priceless!

Free APP

Podcast Networks

Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts

Subscribe and Listen on Your Favorite APP

Our Columnists and Show Hosts

Support wounded and fallen police officers. The Wounded Blue.

Apple Podcasts

Fighting corporate censorship and ensuring voter integrity...

Apple Podcasts
Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap