Medical writer and vaccine immunology expert Vinu Arumugham has written one of the best articles concerning the issue of vaccine toxicology that I have ever read. It should help every altruistic person who is as concerned as Vinu is about the pandemic of vaccine injuries to better articulate what are the various mechanisms of action of vaccine poisoning when he or she is trying to talk to dubious – and conflicted – pediatricians that order cocktails of toxic vaccines to be injected into their tiny, immunologically-immature infant patients. It should also empower the legions of traumatized parents who have seen their previously healthy babies die or become acutely and chronically ill after being injected with cocktails of vaccines at their “well-baby” exams. This article should embolden these now-activist parents when they try to educate the ineducable and when they try to obtain justice and/or apologies from their indoctrinated, rigidly pro-vaccine physicians who commonly refuse to listen to reason and also typically try to fire the iatrogenically-afflicted families from their practices. Please study this document and then forward it widely. Gary G. Kohls, MD
Short-sighted Influenza Control Policy Based on
Poorly-designed Vaccines Will Sicken More People
By Vinu Arumugham
A simplistic picture is currently portrayed about the influenza vaccine. The reality is far more complex.
Influenza vaccines cause anti-influenza allergy, aeroallergen allergy and allergic asthma. Anti-influenza allergy causes vaccine ineffectiveness due to IgE neutralizing vaccine antigens. Allergy to influenza, increases morbidity and mortality when a person is eventually infected by the strain due to inevitable vaccine failure (wrong strain chosen by WHO, antigenic drift between wild and vaccine strains, IgE mediated antigen neutralization, etc.).
When the vaccine “works”, it provides only temporary immunity at the expense of allergies, autoimmunity, cancer and loss of long-term protection against influenza.
When the flu vaccine “works”, it makes the population more dependent on WHO making the right strain selection every time and no antigenic drift between wild and vaccine strains. We are creating a more vulnerable population (allergic asthma to HA and no natural influenza protection) that is dependent on an unreliable vaccine.
Influenza vaccine is therefore contributing to increasing influenza-related morbidity and mortality.
We need a new influenza control policy redesigned from scratch to address the big picture.
The Simplistic Picture Currently Portrayed (by the CDC, the WHO, the AAP, etc, etc)
The World Health Organization (WHO) selects 4 influenza virus strains each year for vaccine development. Vaccines are developed and administered. If most people get the vaccine, we have herd immunity and individual protection.
The Complex Reality
Natural Influenza Immunity is Better Than Vaccine-induced Immunity
Influenza vaccine induced immunity lasts for no more than a year, usually only for a few months and sometimes the vaccine may not work at all. WHO may not have selected the right strains. Declining long term, strong, natural herd immunity due to increasing influenza vaccination, increases the likelihood of pandemics. Natural influenza infection results in decades of protection to related strains.
People who were infected by swine flu decades ago had protection against the recent pandemic flu.
Influenza Vaccines Cause Allergies and Allergic Asthma
Injected proteins cause the development of allergy and allergic asthma to those proteins.
Whether the vaccine works or not, vaccine recipients develop or boost long term IgE-mediated allergy to four types of hemaggluttinin (HA) proteins, aeroallergens and egg proteins, following quadrivalent influenza vaccine administration.
Extreme care is needed to eliminate aeroallergen contamination of vaccines. Clean rooms used in vaccine production can filter out large particles (like complete pollen grains, but not sub-pollen particles). Fine allergen particles cannot be completely filtered out.
Focus is on preventing contamination with viable organisms, not allergens. So vaccines can be expected to be contaminated with all types of aeroallergens brought into the vaccine-manufacturing plant by plant personnel. Plant personnel are the main source of aeroallergen contamination. They can be expected to bring all aeroallergens such as from house dust mites, pollen, cat dander, roach allergens etc., to the plant.
Annual vaccination with influenza vaccine is therefore also an aeroallergen allergy booster shot.
As previously described, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) wrongly concluded that influenza vaccine is not associated with asthma. The vaccine boosts aeroallergen related allergies and asthma.
Prediction of Allergic Reactions to the Flublok Vaccine Come True
The Flublok vaccine was approved (inexplicably) with 3X the HA protein content as the regular vaccine. There is no science behind the approval of Flublok. It is like going to two doctors with the same headache complaint and getting 325mg of acetaminophen from one and 1000mg from the other. I predicted that Flublok will cause allergic reactions due to IgE-mediated sensitization caused by previous influenza vaccines and the high HA content in Flublok. VAERS reports of reactions to Flublok occurred as predicted.
Flublok being egg-free was touted as a safe vaccine for those with egg allergy. But it caused allergic reactions due to IgE mediated sensitization to the influenza HA protein itself. And further, it is more likely than a regular vaccine to boost or cause de novo HA allergy.
And reacting to the vaccine is not the only problem. The IgE mediated allergy persists far longer than vaccine protection. So if you are infected, as a top allergy researcher put it: “It would certainly stand to reason that having IgE that recognized flu epitopes could make the course of one’s flu significantly worse.”
Antigenic drift occurs between virus replicating in the wild and the virus replicating in chick eggs for the vaccine. The resulting mismatch between vaccine viral proteins and actual viral proteins, causes the vaccine to be ineffective.
Repeated influenza vaccine administration causes vaccine effectiveness to go down. Repeated Flumist administration failed spectacularly.
Mclean et al. wrote: “Current- and previous-season vaccination generated similar levels of protection, and vaccine-induced protection was greatest for individuals not vaccinated during the prior 5 years.”
One possible explanation is that upon repeat vaccination, circulating long-term persistent anti-influenza IgE antibodies, bind to the injected antigens, neutralize them and make them unavailable for IgG antibody generation required for disease protection.
Periodic influenza-related fever is a natural protection against cancer. We have evolved to depend on this natural protection. The influenza vaccine interferes with this natural protection.
Injecting Animal Protein-contaminated Vaccines Into Healthy Humans is Barbaric
Influenza vaccines are contaminated with egg proteins, Madin Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cell proteins or insect cell proteins, etc. This will result in allergy or numerous autoimmune diseases due to molecular mimicry between these proteins and human proteins as we had with Pandemrix vaccine-induced narcolepsy.
For every case of diagnosed-autoimmune disease, there are numerous subclinical cases. These subclinical diseases could shave decades off your life. So these “rare” (diagnosed as) “adverse events” are the tip of the iceberg.
Protein Sequence Alignment Between GBS Gpitope, Influenza Viruses and C. jejuni
Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS), an autoimmune disorder, has been associated with natural Campylobacter jejuni infections and with the influenza vaccine.
BLASTP methodology was used for protein sequence alignment. As shown before, a BLASTP sequence alignment score of 19.3 was obtained comparing human hypocretin receptor and H1N1 nucleoprotein contained in the Pandemrix vaccine. This level of sequence alignment was sufficient to cause autoimmunity that resulted in hypocretin dysregulation and narcolepsy. Therefore, any score equal to or higher than 19.3 suggests high probability of autoimmunity.
While vaccines target one or a few particular viral, bacterial proteins, most vaccines are contaminated with all proteins from that virus or bacteria. Example: the Pandemrix vaccine contained both H1N1 hemagglutinin (target) and H1N1 nucleoproteins (contaminant). The exceptions are recombinant vaccines. In recombinant vaccines, the vaccine contains only the target protein from the target organism. The target protein is produced usually by genetically modifying yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae).
Hepatitis B and HPV vaccines are produced using this technique. Such vaccines are however, contaminated with all Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins.
Protein sequence alignment was performed between human alpha-2,8-sialyltransferase 8E, C. jejuni and influenza strain proteins. Protein sequence for alpha-2,8-sialyltransferase 8E was obtained from Uniprot hypothetical protein [Campylobacter jejuni].
*Here I have deleted a complex graph which is available at: https://zenodo.org/record/1112421#.XC5GSlxKg2w)
With all scores above 19.3, there is a strong likelihood of the influenza vaccine causing GBS antibodies.
Universal Influenza Vaccine
If a universal influenza vaccine were possible, our immune system would have produced such antibodies that protect against all influenza viruses.
One possible reason why such universal protection does not occur, is that the invariant antigens of the influenza virus may have molecular mimicry to human self-antigens. So our immune system does not risk autoimmunity by creating antibodies against the invariant parts of the influenza virus.
One would expect from evolution that the influenza viruses best suited for survival are likely to have evolved invariant antigens that resemble human self-antigens. Such a feature blunts the human immune response to the virus. So a universal vaccine is likely to result in unacceptable autoimmunity risk.
Influenza vaccines cause anti-influenza allergy, aeroallergen allergy and allergic asthma. Anti-influenza allergy causes vaccine ineffectiveness due to IgE neutralizing vaccine antigens.
Allergy to influenza, increases morbidity and mortality when a person is eventually infected by the strain due to inevitable vaccine failure (wrong strain chosen by WHO, antigenic drift between wild and vaccine strains, IgE mediated antigen neutralization, etc.).
If and when the vaccine “works”, it provides only temporary immunity at the expense of allergy, autoimmunity, cancer and loss of long-term protection against influenza.
When the flu vaccine “works”, it makes the population more dependent on WHO making the right strain selection every time and no antigenic drift between wild and vaccine strains.
We are creating a more vulnerable population (allergic asthma to HA and no natural influenza protection) that is dependent on an unreliable vaccine.
Influenza vaccine is therefore contributing to increasing influenza vaccine-related morbidity and mortality.
Where are the peer-reviewed studies accounting for all the above factors and still supporting the oft-repeated claim that the benefits of the vaccines far outweigh the risks?
We need a new influenza control policy redesigned from scratch to address the big picture.