May 7, 2021

May 7, 2021

Your Source for Free Speech,
Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News.

Are There Exceptions to the Constitution?

by | Apr 26, 2021 |

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

A case recently argued before the Supreme Court asked whether the community caretaker exception” allows police officers to enter a home without a warrant to seize property. Let’s examine how constitutional law, which is nothing more than the opinion of judges, is being used to circumvent the Constitution of the United States.

Oral arguments were given before the Supreme Court in the case Caniglia v. Strom. The petitioner, Edward A. Caniglia, has sued Robert F. Strom and several other officials of the city of Cranston, RI, after police officers entered his home without a warrant and confiscated Mr. Stroms property, specifically two handguns, then refused to return them. Specifically, Mr. Strom claimed that the city of Cranston had violated his rights protected by the Second and Fourth Amendments and that the city violated the Fourteenth Amendments Due Process and Equal Protection clauses. From the complaint:

At issue here is Petitioners claim that the entry into his home and resulting seizures—effected without a warrant or civil order—violated his Fourth Amendment rights. The officersonly justification for the entry and seizures was the community caretaking” exception.

Caniglia v. Strom Petition for Certiorari to the Supreme Court

The argument made by Mr. Stroms attorney was quite simple:

The Fourth Amendment recognizes the sanctity of the home by drawing a firm line at the door. The government cannot cross that line without a warrant unless there is consent or exigent circumstances. Here, there was neither. Respondentswarrantless seizure of Petitioner from his home and their subsequent seizures of his lawfully possessed guns from his bedroom and garage violated the Fourth Amendment.

Caniglia v. Strom Oral Arguments

As one would expect, the attorney for the city of Cranston argued differently:

The question presented is whether caretaking by police officers and first responders may, under certain circumstances, take place in the home without a warrant. It should. The Petitioner has an absolute position: Under no circumstances should a warrantless caretaking occur inside a home, except upon consent or exigent circumstances. This absolute all-or-nothing approach is contrary to the reasonableness standard of the Fourth Amendment, the very touchstone of the Fourth Amendment. There may be circumstances that allow for caretaking in the home absent a warrant when the advent of the potential harm is not so clear, but the need to respond could be immediate. Time could be of the essence.

Caniglia v. Strom Oral Arguments

So which argument is correct?

Community Caretaking

If I understand the arguments made correctly, the community caretaking exception” was something the courts came up with based on hypothetical arguments made in cases like Cady v Dombrowski, which involved a search of a vehicle in police custody. There is just one problem. There is no exception to the Constitution, period. In order for a search to be legal, it must be reasonable. While the definition of reasonable is not as specific as we would like, that is the standard.

Having the faculty of reason, endued with reason, as a reasonable being.

Reasonable – Websters 1828 Dictionary

A faculty of the mind by which it distinguishes truth from falsehood, and good from evil, and which enables the possessor to deduce inferences from facts or from propositions.

Reason – Websters 1828 Dictionary

When the term reasonable” is used in the Constitution, it is most often referred to as what a reasonable person would find reasonable. I know, circular logic, but that tends to be the standard most often used. The idea of the community caretaker exception” seems to be distinguishing between the investigative functions of law enforcement and its merely caretaker functions. However, this brings to light another fallacy about the Constitution.

The limitations the Constitution places are upon government, not simply law enforcement. It is just as illegal for a public school official, a census taker, or a city dog catcher to search or seize you or your property as it is for law enforcement to do so. For any government official to search you or your property, it must be reasonable. That generally means that either there must be an imminent threat to someone or that the official has gone to court to get a legitimate warrant. Should a government official with legitimate concern for the welfare of someone enter a home, they should not be allowed to search t; that would be unreasonable. Weve all seen the crime drama where the law enforcement officer, knowing” that there is evidence in someones home, pretends to hear a call for help, then uses that as justification for entering and searching. I know of no reasonable person that would consider that a reasonable search. In the same vein, should law enforcement be dispatched to someones home for a wellness check,” they are there to check on a person’s health and should not be allowed to use that as an excuse to search or seize items, even if they are in plain view.

WATCH THE VIDEO ON RUMBLE

Was the Seizure Reasonable?

Before we go on, let us look at the question of reasonableness in this case. After a heated argument between Mr. Caniglia and his wife, Mrs. Caniglia spent the night at a motel. The next day, concerned about her husband, Mrs. Caniglia contacted Cranston police and asked them to escort her home and do a wellness check on her husband.

When multiple officers arrived to meet her, Mrs. Caniglia told them what had happened and that she was concerned about her husbands safety—including the possibility that he could be suicidal.

After calling Petitioner, who sounded fine,” the officers escorted Mrs. Caniglia back to the home, where they instructed her to stay in the car while they spoke with Petitioner on the back deck. Petitioner told the officers about what had happened and that he had said just shoot me” because he couldnt take it anymore.” “He was calm for the most part,” “seemed normal,” and said, that he would never commit suicide.” Mrs. Caniglia then entered the home.

Caniglia v. Strom Petition for Certiorari to the Supreme Court

Say what you will about the wisdom of Mr. Caniglias words, uttered in the heat of the moment when interviewed outside his home; the officers found him calm and normal but were not convinced.

Based on their conversations with Petitioner and Mrs. Caniglia, the officers believed there was a risk that Petitioner would harm himself. As a result, they summoned a rescue lieutenant from the Cranston Fire Department to the Canigliashome. That officer told Petitioner that he was taking him to a local hospital. Petitioner went along after the police told him they would not take his two handguns if he did so. At the hospital, a nurse and a social worker examined Petitioner. He was discharged the very same day but had to pay about $1000 for the visit.

Caniglia v. Strom Petition for Certiorari to the Supreme Court

The police officers convinced Mr. Strom to go to the hospital for an examination, a trip which cost him $1,000. Mr. Strom would only go after the police told him they would not take his firearms, but that was not the case:

Meanwhile, the officers entered the Canigliashome to seize Petitioners guns. The officers believed it was reasonable to do so based on [Petitioners] state of mind” and feared that [Petitioner] and others could be in danger” if guns remained in the home. After the officers falsely represented to Mrs. Caniglia that Petitioner had consented, she led the officers to the guns. The officers then seized them.

Caniglia v. Strom Petition for Certiorari to the Supreme Court

And law enforcement wonders why people dont trust them? First, they lied to Mr. Caniglia about them confiscating his property. Then they lied to his wife about Mr. Caniglias consent. If the officers thought they had probable cause to seize the weapons, why did they not get a warrant? Police noted that Mr. Caniglia seemed normal and, for the most part, calm. Yet they thought it reasonable to not only confiscate this mans property without any probable cause? If the police officers thought it was reasonable, why did they wait until after Mr. Caniglia had left the premises? And why did they lie to him about their intentions? Yes, the wife stated that she was concerned, but if she thought it was reasonable for the officers to confiscate her husbands firearms, why did they have to lie to her about his consent? To add insult to injury, this saga was not finished.

A few days later, Mrs. Caniglia went to the police station to retrieve the guns. Officers refused her request. A month later, Petitioner went to the police station with the same request. Again, the officers refused. When Petitioners attorney made the same request, he fared no better.

Caniglia v. Strom Petition for Certiorari to the Supreme Court

So we have an illegal seizure of private property, deprivation of rights under color of law, and law enforcement was allowed to lie during the commission of a crime while acting under their oath of office. Yet, it does not seem they have been charged. Instead, we have innocent citizens having to fight for the return of their illegally seized property, property that was not returned until after Mr. Caniglia sued the city.

We should not be surprised when those in government attempt to find exceptions to the Constitution, especially when it restricts their actions. And Im not surprised when government actors, in the form of judges, either invent these exceptions or use those created by their predecessors.

There is no exception to the Fourth Amendments protections, or for that matter, any other constitutional rules. A search or seizure is either reasonable or not. If government actors could not, or do not, get a warrant, they need a really good reason to search and seize. It is not reasonable to use the excuse of checking on someones well-being to circumvent the supreme law of the land. It is also unreasonable and should be illegal for government actors to lie to those they are supposed to serve. If we allow members of courts to continue to violate their oaths to support the Constitution, then we are just as much to blame as they are. I do know that those in the district court who found it reasonable for law enforcement to seize property without probable cause and lied to make that happen should be investigated for judicial misconduct.

If the people of this country cannot trust their courts to abide by the law they swore or affirmed to uphold, then we must demand our representatives in the House do their job and oversee the courts.

If we cannot trust those we hire to represent us to do their jobs, then its about time we found better people to represent us.

Paul Engel

Author and speaker Paul Engel has spent more than 20 years studying and teaching about both the Bible and the U.S. Constitution. That experience helps Paul explain difficult concepts in a way most people can understand. As one manager described, “Paul can take the most complex idea and explain it in a way my grandmother can understand.” Freely admitting that he “learned more about our Constitution from School House Rock (a Saturday morning cartoon) than in 12 years of school,” he says that anyone can be a constitutional scholar. Since 2014 I have been helping everyday Americans read and study the Constitution of their country and teaching the rising generation to be free. Using news and current events as a springboard, I explain the Constitution and encourage others to stand up and secure the blessings of liberty for themselves, their children, and the nation.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Use the code ‘OUTLOUD’ and receive your 20% discount on your first order.

Democrat Free Lunch Tab Charged to You and Your Children

Democrat Free Lunch Tab Charged to You and Your Children

Do not forget that those corporate taxes get passed back to most Americans who don’t come close to making yearly $400,000 bonanzas. It also whacks huge numbers of investors, including 53% of American households — 100 million of them — that have lifetime savings held in individual 401(k) and IRA accounts … along with prices we all pay for their services and products we depend upon…

The Hidden Side of Medical Cancel Culture

The Hidden Side of Medical Cancel Culture

Let’s be clear; you aren’t wearing a mask for your health; you are wearing it because you’ve been duped by the medical cancel culture. The same goes for the social distancing and the radical “vaccine” experimentation. The truth is, we have a ways to go before we will be able to tally the full carnage from Coronamania. If we don’t start opening our eyes and ears to…

Florida Governor’s Pen Is Mightier Than The Sword

Florida Governor’s Pen Is Mightier Than The Sword

Florida will fine any business or school $5,000 each time it requires a “VACCINE PASSPORT” or proof of COVID 19 vaccination. DeSantis states, “I was proud to sign landmark legislation to protect individual liberties. SB 2006 Bans Vaccine Passports; Prohibits Indefinite Lockdowns; Ends Local Restrictions on Small Businesses; and Bolsters Emergency Preparedness for Future Health Emergencies.”

Soros in Myanmar, and Soros in Maricopa – Same Game

Soros in Myanmar, and Soros in Maricopa – Same Game

More and more evidence is being uncovered almost daily, revealing the nefarious forces who are actively involved in trying to “fundamentally transform” this country. One of the driving forces is the George Soros organization, which has been hard at work trying to change the face of America not just in national elections, but also at the grassroots level…

The Two Minute Hate is Now 24/7

The Two Minute Hate is Now 24/7

In George Orwell’s prophetic dystopian novel 1984, all citizens of the tyrannical country of Oceania must participate in a daily public ritual called the Two Minute Hate. What we are now seeing and hearing from the Leftist Marxist Democratic Socialists is a new version of the Two Minute Hate. “Get in their face!” screams Maxine Waters. “Confront them in restaurants!” …

Joe Biden is Unfit to be Commander-in-Chief

Joe Biden is Unfit to be Commander-in-Chief

While Biden is contemplating his navel for more twisted ‘inspirations,’ and while the Democrats and leftists are undergoing an unrelenting process of intellectual masturbation, China, Russia, North Korea, Ayatollahs, and Fundamentalist Muslims, are sharpening their knives to slice bits from America’s allies to start with, and slaughter the USA later…

Conservative Leadership, Where is it?

Conservative Leadership, Where is it?

There is a double standard of justice under which Republican politicians, except those who served under Trump and newbies who refuse to play the game, feel the warming embrace of security from prosecution so long as things remain the same. One must wonder why Hillary Clinton isn’t in the dock yet. Her crimes, and Obama’s, and now, even John Kerry’s, are simply ignored by the DoJ, the FBI, and the media…

What Kind of HATE Lets Fellow Americans Go Hungry?

What Kind of HATE Lets Fellow Americans Go Hungry?

Conservatives are usually too busy working, being productive, and moving forward in life to bother with such negative stuff. Leftists, on the other hand, many unemployed and living on the taxpayer’s dole, have the time and an agenda that includes demolishing their “enemies.” It’s their way of taking from the “haves” and giving to the “have-nots.” Saul Alinsky, the father of…

How Capitalism Dies

How Capitalism Dies

Will our economy be able to grow enough to make all of this spending affordable, or are we going to change the basic framework of our economy such that we go into a death spiral? Joe Biden and Kamala Harris promise to build a nation of ‘equity.’ In other words, goodbye capitalism, and hello the government being the provider of all things. If so, our economy will go into its death throes, and though like the Titanic…

The Woke Revolution Is Driving America Towards Communism

The Woke Revolution Is Driving America Towards Communism

Socialists tell us that they will feed, clothe and shelter us with access to free medical care as long as we keep them in power. But this is really a form of slavery, dependent on coercion and the suppression of human freedom. Socialism ties people to the government, just as medieval landlords tied their serfs to the land. The framers of our constitution knew that the system they established could only survive if it were fought for.

Your Source for Free Speech, Talk Radio, Podcasts, and News

 

Here we take on the challenges of our generation so that we can preserve future generations.

LISTEN on the iHeart Radio Network

iHeartRadio

Get the Free APP to listen to great talk radio and podcast:

Free APP

Subscribe and Listen on Your Favorite APP

Apple Podcasts
Google Podcasts
Spotify
Pandora
Tunein
iHeart
Stitcher

If you love to listen, you'll love America Out Loud Podcasts!

Our Columnists and Show Hosts

Apple Podcasts
Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap